Skip to main content

Complaint at ACB against Competent Rent Authority Vaibhav Puri and Additional Commissioner Kisan N Jawle

 



Mumbai: Complaint has been registered at Anti corruption bureau ie. ACB Mumbai for corruption and misconduct in the office of Competent rent authority, Bandra by Mr Vaibhav Puri and his senior Mr Kisan N Jawle Additional commissioner , IAS as revision authority. As per Maharashtra Rent Control Act 1999 both officers only have jurisdiction to listen matter of dispute under the definition of premises. The premises word is defined at Maharashtra Municipal act 1888 with section 353 B . The issue is that both the officers are  entertaining cases of unauthorize structure which donot comply premises definitions.  In A Palghar dispute matter the respondent informed that this authority have no jurisdiction to entertain this application as the building is unauthorize and copy of RTI also shared with him. But Mr Vaibhav Puri did not taken this on record and passed order for eviction in favour of petitioner. By showing registration paper the petitioner was claiming flat to be authorize . The Palghar municipal have no record of CC and OC as per RTI reply.

The Competent rent authority is taking matter of unauthorize buildings and passing eviction order against rule of law. As per Bombay High Court order in Prathmesh Tower the civil court should not entertain the cases of unauthorize  buildings . Mr Vaibhav Puri have full knowledge of law then also he is doing corruption in his office to favour petitioners as per complainant . 

The Complainant filed revision application before Additional Commissioner Mr Kisan N Jawle opposite Museum , Mumbai CSMT. He did not listen the revisionist and dismissed the petition in single hearing that you have challenged the eviction order not eviction petition. As per SC order petition should be allowed to be corrected if so. But there is nexus between both the officers to promote illegal building and neglect Bombay High court order . They have no respect of SC and HC rulings . It is a case of criminal misconduct and give advantage to other persons against rule of law. The punishment is of 5 -7 years imprisonment as per PC act 1988. Manish Sisodia is also behind the bar under section 7 and 13 of PC act 1988. Recently Maharashtra ACB issued notice to a SC Judge in corruption case filed by Rashid pathan. Soon CRPC 156 matter will be filed before Corruption court at Session . Accused will not get protection under 17A if it not part of duty to disobey law and Bombay high Court orders which are binding for them. Delhi and Kerla HC defined the protection under section 17 A to public servants in recent cases.



As per SC order the competent authority is not court 


Supreme Court of India

Iqbal Singh Narang & Ors vs Veeran Narang on 30 November, 2011

Bench: Altamas Kabir, Surinder Singh Nijjar

 

 

12. In the decision rendered by this Court in Prakash H. Jain Vs. Marie Fernandes [(2003) 8 SCC 431], this Court held that the Competent Authority  under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, is at best a statutory authority created for a definite purpose and to exercise powers in a quasi-judicial manner, but its powers were strictly circumscribed by the very statutory provisions which conferred upon it those powers and the same could be exercised in the manner provided therefor and subject to such conditions and limitations stipulated by the very provisions of law under which the Competent Authority itself was created.

The aforesaid decisions of this Court establish that though the Rent Controller discharges quasi-judicial functions, he is not a Court, as understood in the conventional sense and he cannot, therefore, make a complaint under Section 340 Cr.P.C. Consequently, as held by the High Court, a complaint could be made by a private party in the proceedings.

15. In addition to the above, we also see no reason to quash the proceedings in which the Appellants herein had been summoned under Section 193/420/120-


The Additional commissioner has power to quash the order of competent authority by sumotoo but he dismissed the revision very cleverly and upheld the wrong doings of his junior . As per complainant they are doing crime under section 7 and 13 of PC act 1988 amended .


Bombay High Court

Shrikant Dattatraya Deshpande vs Shalini Waman Bhat And Ors on 13 September, 2019

Bench: D. S. Naidu

https://indiankanoon.org/doc/164402542/

82. Under Section 44, the Additional Commissioner of a Revenue Division, may, at any time, suo motto or on the application of any person aggrieved, can exercise its revisional power. It is only for "satisfying itself that an order made in any case by the Competent Authority under section 43 is according to law." To ascertain that the Competent Authority's authority has acted under the law, the Revisional Authority can "call for the record of that case and pass such order in respect thereto as it or he thinks fit."



Question of law is that if the competent authority is not a court then how it can entertain execution petition without jurisdiction? The petitioner should approach civil court for executions  .


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

FDA Maharashtra Directory Contact Moblie Number

Food and Drug Administration Directory  DOWNLOAD JUNE 2021 CONTACT LIST PLZ CLICK ADVERTISEMENT TO SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE FOR REVENUE FROM ADVERTISEMENT Field Office Circle Head (Assit Commissioner Address of Field Office Inspector AHMEDNAGAR A.T. RATHOD (7045757882) 19C, Siddhivinayak Colony,,Near Auxillium School, Savedi,,Ahmednagar - 414003 J.H.SHAIKH (9158424524) AKOLA H. Y. METKAR (9730155370) Civil Line, Akashwani Road, ,Akola ,AKOLA H. Y. METKAR (9730155370) AMARAVATI U.B.GHAROTE (9595829895) Office of the Joint Commissioner,Jawade Compound, Near Bus Stand,Amrawati-444 601 C. K. DANGE (9422844477) AURANGABAD S. S. KALE (9987236658) Office of the Joint Commissioner,,2nd floor, Nath Super Market, Aurangpura,Aurangabad R. M. BAJAJ (9422496941) AURANGABAD Zone 2

Mahatma Gandhi Adopted Feroze Khan For Indira Marriage & Gave "Gandhi" Surname

Mahatma Gandhi Given His Surname To Indra as "Gandhi" Nehru-Khan-Gandhi Dynasty : Jawaharlal Nehru was the first prime minister of modern India, and he ruled the country from 1947 to 1964.  He was born on 14th November 1889, to Motilal and Swarup Rani Nehru.  The family belonged to a Kashmiri Brahmin tribe called ‘ Pandit.’   Indira Gandhi, daughter of Jawaharlal Nehru, became prime minister of India in 1966. Mrs. Gandhi was born on November 19, 1917 to Jawaharlal and Kamala Nehru.  She was named Indira Priyadarshini Nehru. She fell in love and decided to marry Feroze Khan, a family friend. Feroze Khan’s father, Nawab Khan, was a Muslim, and mother was a Persian Muslim.  Jawaharlal Nehru did not approve of the inter-caste marriage for political reasons (see  http://www.asiasource.org/ society/indiragandhi.cfm ).  If Indira Nehru were to marry a Muslim she would loose the possibility of becoming the heir to the future Nehru dynasty.  At this juncture, a

RTE & School Quota Of Kalyan Dombivli KDMC Region Thane

 Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Region School Quota and RTE 25% quota details received from RTI reply from KDMC Education department. Almost in all the schools free education seats for income below Rs1lac is vacant .The vacant seats are illegally filled by private school in open category by private schools by taking donations. KDMC education didnot taken any action. Total approved strength of class is 4 times of RTE quota. If RTE 25% quota is 25 then approved students limit is 100 students. Means 75 students from general and 25 from RTE 25% quota. In all the schools students are more than from approved strength and RTE 25% seats are vacant. It means RTE seats are filled by general students. As per RTE Act 2009 poor quota seats ie RTE25% cannot be filled by general quota in any condition and at any class. Helpline 9702859636  RTE Admission