Skip to main content

Complaint Filed Against NCLT New Delhi Member Sh. Ch. Mohd. Tariq By Adv. Nicky Pokar (President Women’s Wing Indian Bar Association)

WHEN A JUDGE BECOMES THE LITIGANT

AND SHARES NCLT DEPARTMENTAL PROCEEDINGS TO OUTSIDE AUTHORITIES TO SAVE HIMSELF AND REAL OFFENDERS



In a recent incident Ld. NCLT New Delhi Member Sh. Ch. Mohd. Tariq during a Virtual Hearing started humiliating a litigant, disparagingly addressing by his family name. Adv. Nicky Pokar (President Women’s Wing Indian Bar Association) who attempted to protest was rudely shut down, prompting her to lodge a complaint with the Hon’ble President of India, the judge Sh. Tariq was sought for his explanation. In his reply loaded of falsities to his supervising official Hon’ble Acting President of NCLT, to threaten Adv. Nicky Pokar & Sh. Partha Sarathy Sarkar and to scuttle proceedings against him shares the reply to Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa & to Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board of India, scandalising Adv. Nicky Pokar and the litigant Sh. Partha Sarathy Sarkar. But in his spree of nastiness, he annexed photo-copies of documents which could have been obtained by stealing them from the office of NCLT & illegally photocopying them


Unfortunately, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Board of India ‘IBBI’ headed by an ex-lawyer of considerable repute - Sh. MS Sahoo and his qualified legal team slipped where even a law intern would not have done so, apparently in not even seeking permission from NCLT to use their internal communication and documents stolen and illegally photocopied to initiate disciplinary proceedings against Sh. Partha Sarathy Sarkar, a Registered Insolvency Professional with ‘IBBI’ and in harassing him with defamatory allegations. Sh. Partha Sarathy Sarkar through RTI obtained the documents (which in places was defaced and disfigured by IBBI Officials, inferably prompted out of some ulterior motives) and shockingly found, that it was not the opposing litigant who was the complainant, but it was Sh. Tariq - the NCLT judge who stepped himself into the shoes of the opposite litigant and started canvassing for him, inferably he must be ‘the beneficial owner’ for the claim of the litigant before him. Sh. Tariq in his canvassing for the litigant went into such absurd overdrive prompting one to believe that Sh. Tariq might be suffering serious mental imbalance of hallucination alleging and defaming all and sundry, stooping himself to bluffs to silence persons complaining against him – unprecedented in the judicial history.  

Given the gross criminalities and abuse of power by a judge and senior public officials, besides the manner Sh. Tariq, Sh. MS Sahoo & other IBBI Officials acted in contempt of Judicial Rulings by Hon’ble Supreme Court & High Courts, various Advocates and office bearers of Bar Associations expressed their dismay and concern as to how the rule of law and majesty of Court is brought to disrepute; prompting Adv. Nicky Pokar to file a complaint with the Hon’ble President of India in seeking strict disciplinary & criminal proceedings against the Judge Sh. Tariq (given his bizarre conduct, including his mental health check-up too), Sh. MS Sahoo (Chairperson, IBBI) & other IBBI Officials who apparently conspired to commit multiple offences including framing of incorrect document to save the real offenders from the clutches of law and to cause misuse of lawful authority by public officials to massacre justice.


DOWNLOAD COPY OF COMPLAINT 

Comments

  1. These false allegations has snatched a gem from Indian Judiciary.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How it is known, that the allegations were true ir false Would you share evidences in possession of you, would greatly help the investigation of the charges

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FDA Maharashtra Directory Contact Moblie Number

Food and Drug Administration Directory  DOWNLOAD JUNE 2021 CONTACT LIST PLZ CLICK ADVERTISEMENT TO SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE FOR REVENUE FROM ADVERTISEMENT Field Office Circle Head (Assit Commissioner Address of Field Office Inspector AHMEDNAGAR A.T. RATHOD (7045757882) 19C, Siddhivinayak Colony,,Near Auxillium School, Savedi,,Ahmednagar - 414003 J.H.SHAIKH (9158424524) AKOLA H. Y. METKAR (9730155370) Civil Line, Akashwani Road, ,Akola ,AKOLA H. Y. METKAR (9730155370) AMARAVATI U.B.GHAROTE (9595829895) Office of the Joint Commissioner,Jawade Compound, Near Bus Stand,Amrawati-444 601 C. K. DANGE (9422844477) AURANGABAD S. S. KALE (9987236658) Office of the Joint Commissioner,,2nd floor, Nath Super Market, Aurangpura,Aurangabad R. M. BAJAJ (9422496941) AURANGABAD Zone 2

Mahatma Gandhi Adopted Feroze Khan For Indira Marriage & Gave "Gandhi" Surname

Mahatma Gandhi Given His Surname To Indra as "Gandhi" Nehru-Khan-Gandhi Dynasty : Jawaharlal Nehru was the first prime minister of modern India, and he ruled the country from 1947 to 1964.  He was born on 14th November 1889, to Motilal and Swarup Rani Nehru.  The family belonged to a Kashmiri Brahmin tribe called ‘ Pandit.’   Indira Gandhi, daughter of Jawaharlal Nehru, became prime minister of India in 1966. Mrs. Gandhi was born on November 19, 1917 to Jawaharlal and Kamala Nehru.  She was named Indira Priyadarshini Nehru. She fell in love and decided to marry Feroze Khan, a family friend. Feroze Khan’s father, Nawab Khan, was a Muslim, and mother was a Persian Muslim.  Jawaharlal Nehru did not approve of the inter-caste marriage for political reasons (see  http://www.asiasource.org/ society/indiragandhi.cfm ).  If Indira Nehru were to marry a Muslim she would loose the possibility of becoming the heir to the future Nehru dynasty.  At this juncture, a

RTE & School Quota Of Kalyan Dombivli KDMC Region Thane

 Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Region School Quota and RTE 25% quota details received from RTI reply from KDMC Education department. Almost in all the schools free education seats for income below Rs1lac is vacant .The vacant seats are illegally filled by private school in open category by private schools by taking donations. KDMC education didnot taken any action. Total approved strength of class is 4 times of RTE quota. If RTE 25% quota is 25 then approved students limit is 100 students. Means 75 students from general and 25 from RTE 25% quota. In all the schools students are more than from approved strength and RTE 25% seats are vacant. It means RTE seats are filled by general students. As per RTE Act 2009 poor quota seats ie RTE25% cannot be filled by general quota in any condition and at any class. Helpline 9702859636  RTE Admission