How Annual Confidential reports of all the Judicial Officers Prepared By High Court Judges?

"In this respect, it is submitted that the procedure of recording of ACRs being following by the Delhi High Court is as follows:-

(a) Annual Confidential reports of all the Judicial Officers are recorded by the Full Court of the High Court on a calendar year basis, at the end of the Calendar year:

(b) Groups of the Judicial Officers of subordinate Courts are placed under the direct supervision and control of individual Hon'ble Judges of the High Court for the purposes of inspection;

(c) The Hon'ble Inspecting Judges call for and assess the monthly disposal of Judicial Officers and also carry out inspection of the Courts of Officers allotted to them. They may also call for judgments from the particular Officers for perusal. Complaints, if any received against the Judicial officers are also placed before the Hon'ble Inspecting Judges and the Hon'ble Judges, after perusal of the complaints, depending upon the nature and merits of the allegation, some times, call for judicial files of the cases to which the complaints are related and pass appropriate orders on the administrative side;

(d) The Hon'ble Inspecting Judges, thereafter, give their Inspection Reports/ Confidential remarks on the working of the Officers concerned, on the proforma prescribed containing columns as mentioned therein; and

(e) At the time of recording of ACRs by the Full Court, the reports of the District and Sessions Judge, if any given, the Inspection, Report of the Hon'ble Inspecting Judge, if made, ummary of monthly disposal of the Officer and a precis of previous 5 years ACRs are placed before the Full Court for its consid eration for the recordings of the ACRs of the Judicial Officers. he personal files and complaint files, it called for, are also placed before the Full Court."

Form to be used in the case of District/Additional District & Sessions Judges/Subordinate Judge/Rent/Additional Rent Controllers/Metropolitan Magistrates).

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Confidential remarks by the Hon'ble Inspecting Judge on the work of Shri P.D. Gupta. DJS FOR THE YEAR 1993.

       1.   Knowledge of law and procedure     Good
      2.   Is he industrious and prompt 
      in the disposal of cases and            Yes
      has he coped effectually with
      heavy work?
      3.   Are his judgments and orders       Yes
      well written and clearly
      expressed?
      4.   (For District and Sessions Judges
      and Senior Subordinate Judges)
      Is his supervision and the 
      distribution of business 
      among, and his control over
      the Subordinate Courts good?
 
      5.   Is he an efficient Judicial        Yes he is good
      Officer?                                officer.
      6.   Has he maintained Judicial         Nothing adverse
      reputation for honesty and              has to come my
      impartiality?                           notice.
      7.   Net result.                        B+(Good)"

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Confidential remarks by the Hon'ble Inspecting Judge on the work of Shri P.D. Gupta, Addl Sr Civil Judge, Tis Hazari FOR THE YEAR 1994.

       1.   Knowledge of law and procedure     Reasonably
                                              good
      2.   Is he industrious and prompt 
      in the disposal of cases and            Yes
      has he coped effectually with 
      heavy work?
      3.   Are his judgments and orders       Yes
      well written and clearly
      expressed?
      4.   (For District and Sessions 
      Judges and Senior Subordinate 
      Judges)
      Is his supervision and the 
      distribution of business
      among, and his control over
      the Subordinate Courts good?
 
      5.   Is he an efficient Judicial        Yes
      Officer?
      6.   Has he maintained Judicial         Nothing adverse
      reputation for honesty and              came to notice
      impartiality?
      7.   Net result.                        B+

Form to be used in the case of District/Additional District & Sessions Judges/Subordinate Judges/Rent/Additional Rent Controllers/Metropolitan Magistrates).

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Confidential remarks by the Hon'ble Inspecting Judge on the work of Shri P.D. Gupta, DJS FOR THE YEAR 1995
1. Knowledge of law and procedure Good
2. Is he industrious and prompt Yes
in the disposal of cases and
has he coped effectually with
heavy work?
3. Are his judgments and orders
well written and clearly Yes
expressed?
4. (For District and Sessions Judges
and Senior Subordinate Judges)

Is his supervision and the
distribution of business
among, and his control over
the Subordinate Courts good?
5. Is he an efficient Judicial Yes
Officer?
6. Has he maintained Judicial
reputation for honesty and
impartiality?
7. Net result.
The representations of Judicial Officers were considered by us in the meetings held on 6.2.97, 6.3.97, 14.5.97, 21.7.97 and 22.7.97. We have perused the personal files, complaint files, ACR files and also judgments of some of the officers. Some discrete enquiries were also made by us. Having fully considered and examined the matter, our recommendations on the representations are as follows:
S. Particulars of the Representation (s)
No. Representation (s) Deserve/Deserves
to be:
1. Two representation dated Rejected
nil of Mr. Ravi Kumar,
Addl. District & Sessions
Judge, Delhi, for upgra-
dation of ACRs recorded
on his work and conduct
for the years 1994 and
1995.
2. Representation dt. 12.7.96 Rejected
of Mr. Prithvi Raj, a
Member of Delhi Higher
Judicial Service for
expunction of adverse
remarks recorded in his
confidential report for
the year 1994-95.
3. Application dated 16.7.96 Rejected
of Mr. G.S. Jugti, a member
of Delhi Higher Judicial
Service for giving him full
particulars on the basis of
which remarks 'C' have been
recorded on his work and
conduct for the year 1995.

4. Representation dated 15.7.96 Rejected
of Mr. Sunil Gaur, a member of
Delhi Higher Judicial Service
for reconsideration of his
Annual Confidential Report for
the year 1995 and giving him
better grade.
5. Representation dated Accepted. The
10.7.96 of Mr. P.S. Teji, a officer deserves
member of Delhi Higher Judicial to be graded as
Service for expunction of 'B' (Average).
adverse remarks recorded in However, the
his ACR for the year 1995. work and conduct
of officer
deserves to be
observed.

6. Representation dated Rejected.
15.7.96 of Mr. M.S. Rohilla
M.M.Shahdara, for expunction
of adverse remarks recorded
in his ACR for the year 1995
and, if deemed fit, for
giving him opportunity to
explain personally.
7. Representation dated Rejected
6.7.96 of Mr. D.S. Sidhu,
M.M. Tis Hazari for
reconsideration/review of
adverse remarks recorded in
his ACR for the year 1995.

8. Representation dated nil Rejected.
of Mr. J.K. Pali,
representation dated 11/3/96
of Mr.Jaswant Singh and
representation dated 8.3.96
of Mr. Z.S Solanki,Ex-members
of Delhi Judicial Service,
addressed to the Lt. Governor,
Delhi, for review of their
cases of premature retirement
and for re-instating them in
service treating the
intervening period of absence
as duty and the request of the
Govt. of NCT of Delhi contained
in their letter No.6/9-96-Judl.
/665 dated 22.4.96 for views/
comments of the Hon'ble High
Court thereon to enable to
submit the case to the Lt.
Governor, Delhi, for his
consideration.
(i) Representation dated 11.7.96 Rejected.
of Mr. Ghanshyam Gupta, M.M.
New Delhi, for deletion of
adverse remarks recorded in
his ACR for the Year 1995 and
for giving him appropriate
gradation and personal hearing.
(ii) Representation dated 26.8.96 Rejected.
of Mr. Ghanshyam Gupta, against
his supersession in the matter
of promotion to Delhi Higher
Judicial Service and for grant
of personal hearing in the
matter.
(iii)Representation dated 20.9.96 Rejected.
of Mr. Ghanshyam Gupta against
adverse entries in his ACR for
the year 1987-88 to 1991 and
for the years 1992 to 1995.

10(i)Representation dated 16.7.96 Rejected.
of Mr. Rajesh Kumar, M.M.
New Delhi for expunction of
adverse remarks recorded in
his ACR for the year 1993,
grant of promotion from the
date of his juniors are
promoted with consequential
benefits, and upgrading the
ACRs recorded on his work and
conduct for the years 1994 and
1995 to 'B+' grading.
(ii) Representation dated 2.11.96 Rejected.
of Mr. Rajesh Kumar, M.M.
against his representation in
the matter or promotion to Delhi
Higher Judicial Service.
11(i) Representation dated 8.7.96 Rejected.
of Mr. P.D. Gupta, M.M.,Tis
Hazari, for expunction of
adverse remarks recorded in
his ACR for the years
1994 and 1995.
(ii) Representation dated 21.2.97 Rejected.
of Mr. P.D. Gupta, MM., Delhi
against his supersession in the
matter of promotion/appointment
to Delhi Higher Judicial Service.

12(i)Application dated 16.7.96 1993-Rejected.
of Mr. S.S. Handa, M.M. Tis
Hazari for supply of a copy of 1994 and 1995:
the reasons, if any recorded at Accepted.
the time of recording of his ACRs No remarks need
for the years 1993, 1994 and be given for
1995 and a copy of the remarks 1994 and 1995.
recorded for these years by the
two Hon'ble Inspecting Judges,
and for extension of time for
making the full and effective
representation.
(ii) Representation dated 8.1.97 -do-
of Mr. S.S. Handa, M.M. Tis
Hazari against adverse Annual
Confidential remarks recorded
on his work and Conduct for the
years 1993, 1994 and 1995.

13(i) Representation dated 3.10.96 Rejected.
of Mr. A.B. Dateer, an officer
of Delhi Judicial Service against
recommendation of hon'ble High
Court of the names of five
officers of Delhi Judicial
Service, who are Junior to him,
for promotion to Delhi Higher
Judicial Service.
(ii) Representation dated 27.11.96 Rejected.
of Mr. A.S. Dateer, an officer
of Delhi Judicial Service
against adverse Annual
Confidential Remarks recorded
on his work and conduct for
the year 1995.
14. Representation dated 27.9.96 Since proposed
of Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, chargesheet
an officer of Delhi against the
Judicial Service who has officer is
been placed under suspension coming up for
w.e.f. 21.9.96 against the consideration.
order of his suspension. before Full
Court on
26.7.97 it
would be
appropriate that
the matter of
suspension is also
taken up by Full
Court.

15. Note dated 3.9.96 of Hon'ble The officer should
Ms. Justice Usha Mehra in the be warned to be
matter regarding inspection note careful in future
dated 30.11.95 recorded by and his performance
Mr. R.K. Sharma, should be watched by
Additional District & Sessions the Incharge Addl.
Judge in respect of the court Distt. & Sessions
of Mr. Mahavir Singhal,M.M. Tis Judge, who may be
Hazari pointing out certain directed to report
iregularities in the claims of the matter to the
units of disposal charged etc. High Court
pursuant to Administrative quarterly with
Committee decision regard to work and
dated 17.9.1996. conduct of the
officer.
16. Representation dated 2.1.97 Accepted and the
of Mr. I.C. Tiwari an officer officer deserves
of Delhi Higher Judicial to be graded as
Service against adverse Annual per the recommen-
Confidential Remark recorded on dation of the
his work and conduct for the Inspecting Judge.
year 1995.
17. Representation dated 6.1.97 Accepted and the
of Mr. V.K. Malhotra, an officer officer deserves to
of Delhi Higher judicial Service be graded as per
against adverse Annual the recommen-
Confidential remarks dation of the
recorded on his work and Inspecting Judge.
conduct for year 1995.
18. Representation dated 9.12.96 Accepted and
of Mr. I.C. Tewari and work be
representation dated 11.12.96 assigned to
of Mr. V.K. Malhotra, officers the officers.
of Delhi Higher Judicial Service
against withdrawal of judicial
work from them.
19. Representation dated 9.12.96 of Rejected.
Mr. Shiv Charan, an officer of
Delhi Judicial Service for review
and upgrading of ACRs recorded
on his work and conduct for the
year 1995 and for his promotion
as Additional District and
Sessions Judge."

Thereafter, the office put up a notice for compulsory retirement of the appellant under Rule 74 of the Bihar Service Code. That was considered by the Standing Committee on 21.11.1996. The following resolution was adopted:-
"Agenda Declaration
To consider the Having considered
desirability of taking the entire service
action under Rule records of each of
74 of the Bihar Service the following 4
Code against a few officers:
officers of the
Subordinate Judiciary
(XIX-31-96)
1. Sh. Madan Mohan
Choudhary Addl.
Distt. & Sess.
Judge, Madhubani.

2 .............
3 .............
4 .............

It is resolved that it is
not in the public interest
to retain their services any
longer and they should,
therefore, be retired
compulsorily from service
under Rule 74(b)(ii) of the
Bihar Service Code.

The above decision be
placed before the meeting of
the Full Court, scheduled to
be held on 30th November,
1996 as per Rule 3(n) of
Chapter-I Part-I of the
Rules of the High Court at
Patna instead of getting
it circulated."

On 30.11.1996 the Full Court met. The Resolution of the Standing Committee was approved. The relevant extract of the minutes of the Full Court meeting is as under:-
"Item No. 7:- To consider the decision of
the Standing Committee
regarding compulsory
retirement of Judicial
Officers under Rule 74
of the Bihar Service
Code, 1952.

The decision of the Standing Committee meeting dated 21.11.96 regarding compulsory retirement of the following Judicial Officers under Rule 74(b) of the Bihar Service Code, is considered by the Full Court and the same is approved.
1. Shri Madan Mohan Choudhary, Addl. Distt. & Sessions Judge, Madhubani.
2..............
3...............
4..............

Read https://indiankanoon.org/doc/945314/
Delhi High Court
Purshottam Dass Gupta (Shri) vs Union Of India on 28 May, 1999
Equivalent citations: 1999 IVAD Delhi 645, 80 (1999) DLT 230

हिन्दू शब्द वेदों से लिया गया है ना की फ़ारसी से

HINDU WORD ORIGIN PLZ CLICK ADVERTISEMENT TO SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE FOR REVENUE FROM ADVERTISEMENT हिन्दू शब्द सिंधु से बना है औऱ यह फारसी शब्द है। परंतु ऐसा कुछ नहीं है! ये केवल झुठ फ़ैलाया जाता है।ये नितांत असत्य है ........ "हिन्दू"* शब्द की खोज - *"हीनं दुष्यति इति हिन्दूः से हुई है।”* *अर्थात* जो अज्ञानता और हीनता का त्याग करे उसे हिन्दू कहते हैं। 'हिन्दू' शब्द, करोड़ों वर्ष प्राचीन, संस्कृत शब्द से है! यदि संस्कृत के इस शब्द का सन्धि विछेदन करें तो पायेंगे .... *हीन+दू* = हीन भावना + से दूर *अर्थात* जो हीन भावना या दुर्भावना से दूर रहे, मुक्त रहे, वो हिन्दू है ! हमें बार-बार, सदा झूठ ही बतलाया जाता है कि हिन्दू शब्द मुगलों ने हमें दिया, जो *"सिंधु" से "हिन्दू"* हुआ l *हिन्दू शब्द की वेद से ही उत्पत्ति है !* जानिए, कहाँ से आया हिन्दू शब्द, और कैसे हुई इसकी उत्पत्ति ? हमारे "वेदों" और "पुराणों" में *हिन्दू शब्द का उल्लेख* मिलता है। आज हम आपको बता रहे हैं कि हमें हिन्दू शब्द कहाँ से मिला है! "ऋग्वेद" के *"

Main news

" World India News " E Paper

Search This Blog

How Annual Confidential reports of all the Judicial Officers Prepared By High Court Judges?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FDA Maharashtra Directory Contact Moblie Number

हिन्दू शब्द वेदों से लिया गया है ना की फ़ारसी से

RTE & School Quota Of Kalyan Dombivli KDMC Region Thane