Skip to main content

Complaint filed against NCLT Delhi Board Member Sh. Ch. Mohd. S. Tariq for making false submissions

 



Adv. Nicky Pokar President Indian Bar Association (Women’s Wing) files complaint U/s 193 of IPC & Sec 42 of Advocates Act against NCLT New Delhi Tribunal Member Sh. Ch. Mohd. S. Tariq for false submissions before Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa. 

On 26th October, 2020 during VC hearing in the Court of Sh. Tariq and Sh. NK Bhola; Sh. Tariq brashly started addressing the family name of a litigant despite being repeatedly requested to refrain, yet he continued insulting the litigant, prompting Adv. Nicky Pokar to lodge a complaint with the Hon’ble President of India, which was referred to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, thereafter to NCLT New Delhi. Adv. Pokar had also filed an advance copy of the complaint to NCLT New Delhi, basis which Registrar NCLT had sought comments of Sh. Tariq on 27th Oct, 2020, which he didn’t care to reply for two months until an RTI was filed by Adv. Pokar seeking status of her complaint. Pursuant to the RTI query, Sh. Tariq filed his reply on 31st Dec, 2020 to NCLT Acting President copying it to Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa who sought response from Adv. Nicky Pokar, in her response, Adv. Pokar detailed as to how Sh. Mohd. Tariq indulged in misbehaviour, falsities & threatened her of contempt proceedings for complaining against him and also for seeking response under RTI.

Sh. Tariq in his reply to NCLT Acting President identified himself as ‘Authority’ though ceased to be so in respect of the concerned proceedings. Adv. Pokar alleges irresponsibility on the part of Sh. Tariq who though a judicial officer became judgmental about the proceeding which was not being adjudicated by him. The complaint of Adv. Pokar also raises question as to how and when could the documents of a case which is before a different bench could reach the hands of Sh. Tariq, that too during Christmas vacation. 

Sh. Tariq is alleged of multiple falsities in his submission to Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa and also committing contempt of multiple superior authorities hence action has been sought against him U/s 193 of IPC and imposition of heavy cost for making false and contumacious submissions, including threatening Advocate of Contempt Proceedings. 

Various bar associations across the country shocked by the conduct of Sh. Tariq Mohd. resolved to make representation seeking strict and severe action against him for abusing his authority as a judicial officer in assaulting the independence of bar and threatening them with contempt proceedings.

DOWNLOAD COPY OF COMPLAINT



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FDA Maharashtra Directory Contact Moblie Number

Food and Drug Administration Directory  DOWNLOAD JUNE 2021 CONTACT LIST PLZ CLICK ADVERTISEMENT TO SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE FOR REVENUE FROM ADVERTISEMENT Field Office Circle Head (Assit Commissioner Address of Field Office Inspector AHMEDNAGAR A.T. RATHOD (7045757882) 19C, Siddhivinayak Colony,,Near Auxillium School, Savedi,,Ahmednagar - 414003 J.H.SHAIKH (9158424524) AKOLA H. Y. METKAR (9730155370) Civil Line, Akashwani Road, ,Akola ,AKOLA H. Y. METKAR (9730155370) AMARAVATI U.B.GHAROTE (9595829895) Office of the Joint Commissioner,Jawade Compound, Near Bus Stand,Amrawati-444 601 C. K. DANGE (9422844477) AURANGABAD S. S. KALE (9987236658) Office of the Joint Commissioner,,2nd floor, Nath Super Market, Aurangpura,Aurangabad R. M. BAJAJ (9422496941) AURANGABAD Zone 2
28 comments
Main news

RTE & School Quota Of Kalyan Dombivli KDMC Region Thane

 Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Region School Quota and RTE 25% quota details received from RTI reply from KDMC Education department. Almost in all the schools free education seats for income below Rs1lac is vacant .The vacant seats are illegally filled by private school in open category by private schools by taking donations. KDMC education didnot taken any action. Total approved strength of class is 4 times of RTE quota. If RTE 25% quota is 25 then approved students limit is 100 students. Means 75 students from general and 25 from RTE 25% quota. In all the schools students are more than from approved strength and RTE 25% seats are vacant. It means RTE seats are filled by general students. As per RTE Act 2009 poor quota seats ie RTE25% cannot be filled by general quota in any condition and at any class. Helpline 9702859636  RTE Admission 
Main news

हिन्दू शब्द वेदों से लिया गया है ना की फ़ारसी से

  HINDU WORD ORIGIN PLZ CLICK ADVERTISEMENT TO SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE FOR REVENUE FROM ADVERTISEMENT हिन्दू शब्द सिंधु से बना है  औऱ यह फारसी शब्द है। परंतु ऐसा कुछ नहीं है! ये केवल झुठ फ़ैलाया जाता है।ये नितांत असत्य है  ........ "हिन्दू"* शब्द की खोज - *"हीनं दुष्यति इति हिन्दूः से हुई है।”* *अर्थात* जो अज्ञानता और हीनता का त्याग करे उसे हिन्दू कहते हैं। 'हिन्दू' शब्द, करोड़ों वर्ष प्राचीन, संस्कृत शब्द से है! यदि संस्कृत के इस शब्द का सन्धि विछेदन करें तो पायेंगे .... *हीन+दू* = हीन भावना + से दूर *अर्थात* जो हीन भावना या दुर्भावना से दूर रहे, मुक्त रहे, वो हिन्दू है ! हमें बार-बार, सदा झूठ ही बतलाया जाता है कि हिन्दू शब्द मुगलों ने हमें दिया, जो *"सिंधु" से "हिन्दू"* हुआ l *हिन्दू शब्द की वेद से ही उत्पत्ति है !* जानिए, कहाँ से आया हिन्दू शब्द, और कैसे हुई इसकी उत्पत्ति ? हमारे "वेदों" और "पुराणों" में *हिन्दू शब्द का उल्लेख* मिलता है। आज हम आपको बता रहे हैं कि हमें हिन्दू शब्द कहाँ से मिला है! "ऋग्वेद" के *"
13 comments
Main news