Skip to main content

Complaint Against District Judge Nagpur By An Advocate....



Nagpur:RTI Act an empowering law was introduced to put a check on the arbitrary conduct of Public Servants – Judiciary too was no exception. Apex Court in its wisdom, emphasising the significance of Transparency in Judicial Functions metaphorically stated, ‘Sunlight the best disinfectant’. Unfortunately subordinate judiciary of Nagpur District Court think’s otherwise or consider themselves beyond the authority of Superior Courts.A complaint came to be filed with the Hon’ble Governor of Maharashtra & Hon’bleBombay High Court against Sh. VB Kulkarni District Judge-1 Nagpur for rejecting a first appeal under the RTI Act, in a manner designed unprecedentedof.

 A Criminal Appeal was filed in Nagpur District Court by Adv. ParthoSarkar, which as per the assignment roster came before the District & Sessions Judge Sh. SASM Ali – On the scheduled date of hearing Adv. ParthoSarkar presented himself; Ld. Judge Sh. Ali, refused to take up the matter and forced a meeting on Adv. Sarkar with theLd. Principal District Judge Sh. AJ Mantri (currently Registrar Vigilance Bombay High Court)Sh. Ali, in the presence of Sh. Mantri & Adv. Sarkar went sensational, of his holding some confidential matter, thereafter proceeded on a false statement, Adv. Sarkar had complained against him, factually which was by a Lawyers Association – since around the same period, there was widespread confabs in the lawyers fraternity, that Ld. Judge Sh. Ali, ignoring evidences, granted safe passage to some senior executives of Future Generali Insurance Company, accused of siphoning hundreds of crores of public money.


The Cr. Appeal came to be transferred to a different judge, under the orders of Sh. AJ Mantri. Adv. Partho Sarkar filed application under RTI Act, seeking the entire information concerning the transfer; the PIO provided all documents except for a letter by Sh. Ali to Sh. Mantri; having been provided only part information/documents, Adv. Sarkar preferred an appeal under the RTI Act, which came up before Ld. District Judge Sh. VB Kulkarni, the contentions raised before him were, the PIO refused information which are within the meaning of Sec-408 (2) of Cr PC &a public document under Sec-74 of The Evidence Act, hence could not have been denied. Also Sh. Kulkarni, was cited the binding precedents of Mangla Ram Jat V/s CPIO, ruled therein, refusal of information has to be within the grounds under Sec-8 (1) or Sec-9 or Sec- 3 of the RTI Act.  The relevant provisions of the RTI Act, was argued in detail. Sh. Kulkarnihowever in rejecting the Appeal treaded into a dangerous course ofunprecedented judicial disorderliness rather outright contempt of Superior Court in completely ignoring the binding precedents in his rejection and visioning,an inconceivable fantasy of supposition – that the document refused was never sought for in the original application under the RTI Act (though entire set of documents were sought)- an entry level judicial officer perhaps too wouldn’t have acted so, in expectingan information seeker to be a magician to have known beforehand what are the documents in the file of the Court and out of them which of the documents PIO will refuse, though entire proceedings were demanded under the RTI Act. Sh. Kulkarni compounds the martyring of RTI Act–wherein he terms contents of documents covered under Section 408 of Cr PC & Section 74 of Evidence act as covered under fiduciary relationship – High time to remind Sh. Kulkarnithe command of the Hon’ble Apex Court - A judge is not a knight errant, to pursue his personal rule, but has to act within the constricted principles of law.

Download Copy Of Complaint 


Popular posts from this blog

FDA Maharashtra Directory Contact Moblie Number

Food and Drug Administration Directory  DOWNLOAD JUNE 2021 CONTACT LIST PLZ CLICK ADVERTISEMENT TO SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE FOR REVENUE FROM ADVERTISEMENT Field Office Circle Head (Assit Commissioner Address of Field Office Inspector AHMEDNAGAR A.T. RATHOD (7045757882) 19C, Siddhivinayak Colony,,Near Auxillium School, Savedi,,Ahmednagar - 414003 J.H.SHAIKH (9158424524) AKOLA H. Y. METKAR (9730155370) Civil Line, Akashwani Road, ,Akola ,AKOLA H. Y. METKAR (9730155370) AMARAVATI U.B.GHAROTE (9595829895) Office of the Joint Commissioner,Jawade Compound, Near Bus Stand,Amrawati-444 601 C. K. DANGE (9422844477) AURANGABAD S. S. KALE (9987236658) Office of the Joint Commissioner,,2nd floor, Nath Super Market, Aurangpura,Aurangabad R. M. BAJAJ (9422496941) AURANGABAD Zone 2

हिन्दू शब्द वेदों से लिया गया है ना की फ़ारसी से

  HINDU WORD ORIGIN PLZ CLICK ADVERTISEMENT TO SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE FOR REVENUE FROM ADVERTISEMENT हिन्दू शब्द सिंधु से बना है  औऱ यह फारसी शब्द है। परंतु ऐसा कुछ नहीं है! ये केवल झुठ फ़ैलाया जाता है।ये नितांत असत्य है  ........ "हिन्दू"* शब्द की खोज - *"हीनं दुष्यति इति हिन्दूः से हुई है।”* *अर्थात* जो अज्ञानता और हीनता का त्याग करे उसे हिन्दू कहते हैं। 'हिन्दू' शब्द, करोड़ों वर्ष प्राचीन, संस्कृत शब्द से है! यदि संस्कृत के इस शब्द का सन्धि विछेदन करें तो पायेंगे .... *हीन+दू* = हीन भावना + से दूर *अर्थात* जो हीन भावना या दुर्भावना से दूर रहे, मुक्त रहे, वो हिन्दू है ! हमें बार-बार, सदा झूठ ही बतलाया जाता है कि हिन्दू शब्द मुगलों ने हमें दिया, जो *"सिंधु" से "हिन्दू"* हुआ l *हिन्दू शब्द की वेद से ही उत्पत्ति है !* जानिए, कहाँ से आया हिन्दू शब्द, और कैसे हुई इसकी उत्पत्ति ? हमारे "वेदों" और "पुराणों" में *हिन्दू शब्द का उल्लेख* मिलता है। आज हम आपको बता रहे हैं कि हमें हिन्दू शब्द कहाँ से मिला है! "ऋग्वेद" के *"

RTE & School Quota Of Kalyan Dombivli KDMC Region Thane

 Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Region School Quota and RTE 25% quota details received from RTI reply from KDMC Education department. Almost in all the schools free education seats for income below Rs1lac is vacant .The vacant seats are illegally filled by private school in open category by private schools by taking donations. KDMC education didnot taken any action. Total approved strength of class is 4 times of RTE quota. If RTE 25% quota is 25 then approved students limit is 100 students. Means 75 students from general and 25 from RTE 25% quota. In all the schools students are more than from approved strength and RTE 25% seats are vacant. It means RTE seats are filled by general students. As per RTE Act 2009 poor quota seats ie RTE25% cannot be filled by general quota in any condition and at any class. Helpline 9702859636  RTE Admission