Mumbai: Complaint against Bombay High Court clerks and officers has been registered by Petitioner Sapan Shrivastava for obstruction to justice before police. In Past on 5 Sept 2019 the Chief Justice Bombay High Court Shri Pradeep Nandrajog and Smt Bharti dangre passed order in PIL 159/2016 to pay penalty of Rs 5 Lac and banned filing of petition if penalty is not paid in 4 weeks. The court not included many important points in order inspite of many request. As per Supreme Court Order If points which are left by judges is not included in order then application can be filed to add points in order. Many advocates are using this provision to get order in favour of their clients. As the ban was related to filing petition but not for following existing petition, the OS, Criminal and civil Department filing staff taken verbal instruction from their officers and denied to accept any affidavit, application etc in pending matters since Sept 2019. Petitioner registered complaint to CJ of BHC and other top officers but Chief justice(through Associate) and other top officers verbally denied to lift the ban on all type of filing. In RTI reply petitioner Sapan Shrivastava received information that no circular has been issued by BHC office to ban filing at Bombay High Court only the order in PIL 159 /2016 (civil) has been circulated to staff.
As the act of staff and officers is failure in discharge of duty and responsibilites so petitioner has registered Police Complaint against Registrar Judicial and other staff Under IPC 166A, 409 to local police station. As IPC 166a is cognisable offence so FIR will be registered soon as per Hon'ble Supreme Court order in Laita Kumari case.
The petitioner has also filed case against Chief Justice Bombay High Court Shri Pradeep Nandrajog , Smt Bharti Dangre and Shri Nitin Jamdar for willful disregard to many Hon'ble Supreme court order before Supreme Court. As per Hon'ble Supreme court the fundamental rights also can not be violated by parliament. The ban on filing the petition and verbal ban on old matters is passed in the interest of their old clients . The remedy before High Court was also not allowed to exhaust because they dont want that important facts should be included in order and the respondents to suffer in large.Due to such act the peoples are loosing faith in judicial system.
Comments
Post a Comment