Skip to main content

Why Mumbai Court Not Registering Case Against VVIP Since last 10 days ?

MM 64 th Court Deny To Number The Defamation Complaint Without Argument Since 16 Sept 2019. Denied To Issue Certified Copy Without Registration Of Complaint.

Mumbai: Chief Metropolitan Magistrate  Esplanda Mumbai Shri MA Shinde  is not taking any initiative to help the complainant to get registration number of a Criminal Defamation Complaint against a top  VVIP  since 16 September 2019. Complainant filed defamation complaint before 64th MM Shri Narendra N Joshi Esplanda Mumbai on 16th Sept 2019 but magistrate asked him to do argument for registration of criminal defamation complaint against the VVIP. Complainant adjourned the argument for 1 week. Later he demanded the Hon'ble MM Narendra N Joshi written order by applying for certified copy. The certified copy department issued receipt to complainant without case number violating standard operating procedure. The judicial clerk of MM 64th Court Mr Sanjay Shelar taken written approval from MM Shri Narendra N Joshi and denied the certified copy inspite of payment done. Later court staff also denied to give the copy of MM written denial. They dont want to share any copy with complainant without case number as direction from court .The registrar Shri DR Hegde said to complainant that he has no power to give direction to Judicial Clerk as the JC is under control of MM. The CMM Shri MA Shinde has also not replied any thing in response of complaint . Now the complainant has moved towards Bombay High Court Judge Hon'ble Smt Sadhana Jadhav who is incharge of All Mumbai District Court. As per complainant it is violation of Hon'ble Supreme Court constitution bench order of access to justice.

Citations:
1. Anita Kushwaha vs. Pushap Sudan, ( (2016) 8 SCC 509 ) has held that access of justice is an integral part of the guarantee contained in Article 21 and 14 of the Constitution of India which guarantees equality before law and equal protection of law to not only citizens but non-citizens also.
2. "Our Constitution protects not only the life and liberty
but also the dignity of every person. Life convicts and hardcore
criminals deprived of personal liberty are also not wholly denuded of
their Constitutional rights. Arbitrariness is an anathema to the
principles of reasonableness and fairness enshrined in our
constitutional provisions. The rule of law prohibits the exercise of
power in an arbitrary manner and/or in a manner that travels beyond
the boundaries of reasonableness. Thus, a statutory authority is not
permitted to act whimsically/arbitrarily. Its actions should be guided
by the principles of reasonableness and fairness. The authority cannot
be permitted to abuse the law or to use it unfairly." Supreme Court of India  Yunus   Khan   Vs.   State   of   Uttar  Pradesh   and   others",   reported   in  (2010)   10   SCC   539.
3. C.S.Karnan ( 2017) 7 SCC 1 it is ruled as under ;
 High Court Judge disobeying Supreme Court direction and abusing process of court sentenced to six months imprisonment.
4. Supreme court pronouncement is binding on lower courts  SC Pronouncement Binding On HCs Even If It Cannot Be Strictly Called 'Ratio Decidendi', Reiterates SC Supreme Court of India. The Peerless Gen.Fin And ... vs Commnr. Of Income Tax on 9 July, 2019

Comments

  1. It's meaningful that the complaint filed by complainant found prima facie evidence, therefore one of the caused to not numbering the said cri.Misc.application by the Honourable CMM

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FDA Maharashtra Directory Contact Moblie Number

Food and Drug Administration Directory  DOWNLOAD JUNE 2021 CONTACT LIST PLZ CLICK ADVERTISEMENT TO SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE FOR REVENUE FROM ADVERTISEMENT Field Office Circle Head (Assit Commissioner Address of Field Office Inspector AHMEDNAGAR A.T. RATHOD (7045757882) 19C, Siddhivinayak Colony,,Near Auxillium School, Savedi,,Ahmednagar - 414003 J.H.SHAIKH (9158424524) AKOLA H. Y. METKAR (9730155370) Civil Line, Akashwani Road, ,Akola ,AKOLA H. Y. METKAR (9730155370) AMARAVATI U.B.GHAROTE (9595829895) Office of the Joint Commissioner,Jawade Compound, Near Bus Stand,Amrawati-444 601 C. K. DANGE (9422844477) AURANGABAD S. S. KALE (9987236658) Office of the Joint Commissioner,,2nd floor, Nath Super Market, Aurangpura,Aurangabad R. M. BAJAJ (9422496941) AURANGABAD Zone 2

RTE & School Quota Of Kalyan Dombivli KDMC Region Thane

 Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Region School Quota and RTE 25% quota details received from RTI reply from KDMC Education department. Almost in all the schools free education seats for income below Rs1lac is vacant .The vacant seats are illegally filled by private school in open category by private schools by taking donations. KDMC education didnot taken any action. Total approved strength of class is 4 times of RTE quota. If RTE 25% quota is 25 then approved students limit is 100 students. Means 75 students from general and 25 from RTE 25% quota. In all the schools students are more than from approved strength and RTE 25% seats are vacant. It means RTE seats are filled by general students. As per RTE Act 2009 poor quota seats ie RTE25% cannot be filled by general quota in any condition and at any class. Helpline 9702859636  RTE Admission 

Mahatma Gandhi Adopted Feroze Khan For Indira Marriage & Gave "Gandhi" Surname

Mahatma Gandhi Given His Surname To Indra as "Gandhi" Nehru-Khan-Gandhi Dynasty : Jawaharlal Nehru was the first prime minister of modern India, and he ruled the country from 1947 to 1964.  He was born on 14th November 1889, to Motilal and Swarup Rani Nehru.  The family belonged to a Kashmiri Brahmin tribe called ‘ Pandit.’   Indira Gandhi, daughter of Jawaharlal Nehru, became prime minister of India in 1966. Mrs. Gandhi was born on November 19, 1917 to Jawaharlal and Kamala Nehru.  She was named Indira Priyadarshini Nehru. She fell in love and decided to marry Feroze Khan, a family friend. Feroze Khan’s father, Nawab Khan, was a Muslim, and mother was a Persian Muslim.  Jawaharlal Nehru did not approve of the inter-caste marriage for political reasons (see  http://www.asiasource.org/ society/indiragandhi.cfm ).  If Indira Nehru were to marry a Muslim she would loose the possibility of becoming the heir to the future Nehru dynasty.  At this juncture, a