Skip to main content

Mumbai: Allegation Against Justice Ranjit More For VIP Treatment to Rich Peoples!


Mumbai: Indian Bar Association registered complaint against Justice Ranjit More for discrimination in urgent matter hearing between rich and poor. As per allegation , he allow precipe to rich parties and deny urgent hearing to poor litigants. This miscarriage of Justice has been highlighted by IBA. Many times it has been observed that many courts allow urgent hearing for  high face value advocates and poor litigants advocates or party in persons are not getting circulation (urgent hearing ). This is violations of Hon'ble Supreme Court rulings for equality before law. But many judges follow the article 14 ie equality before the law.

Important Points of Complaint:

1. Action for serious violation of Article 14 of the Constitution and discrimination of common, poor citizen and majority of advocates by Justice Ranjit More by not granting circulation and not hearing their serious cases related with „their life and liberty‟ and „bread and butter‟, matters of senior citizens saying there is no urgency and the same Judge More granting urgent hearing, „High on Board‟ hearing to Rich people in frivolous and non urgent cases like issue process against Ratan Tata, E-Cigarettes etc and granting final reliefs to them. 
2. Taking immediate measure to protect dignity of Hon‟ble High Court from arbitrary exercise and misuse of discretion by some Judges like Ranjit More, and Ors and taking action against them for serious violation of Article 14 of the Constitution and breach of the oath taken as a High Court Judge. 
3. Taking suo-motu action under contempt of Courts Act as ruled in Re: C.S. Karnan (2017) 2 SCC 756 against Justice Ranjit More and Ors. for wilful disregard and defiance of Supreme Court judgment in Manhari bai‟s case 2013 Cr. L. J.144 for granting undeserving relief to his close Advocate Amit Desai in Charu Sharma‟s case in Criminal Writ Petition No. 671 of 2015 vide order dated 15th July 2019. 
4. Direction to C. B. I. to investigate the misuse of power by Justice Ranjit More as per law laid down in Noida Entrepreneurs Association (2011) 6 SCC 508.......................

That, in Bombay High Court the rules for circulation and listing of the case are not framed properly and this grey area is being used by some unethical Judges like Justice Ranjit More to hear the cases of Rich and mighty people with utmost urgency and all other cases of Senior Citizens, victims, Woman, Common Lawyers (excluding his close association) are not being heard and circulation preceipe are being rejected without any valid reason but by arbitrary exercise of the power.

In the case of Shri. Chandrakant Sambhaji Kurle Vs. State Cri. W. P. No. 2993 of 2019 the Petitioners are seeking stay of investigation in the FIR filed on the instance of false complaint under section 498A by falsely claimed legal wife of the Petitioner No. 1, the case was filed against Father and Mother of petitioner who are senior citizen. The falsity of case proved from „audio-video recording‟, „WhatsApp Chatting‟ etc. The case was filed on 13.06.2019. The matter was mentioned stating the urgency that, Notice given by Police for attending P. S. is without following due process of law, against the statutory provision and against the settled position of law by the Hon‟ble High Court and the Supreme Court. In spite of being serious threat to the personal liberty of the Petitioners, especially to the innocent senior citizen who are Parents of the Petitioner, but Justice Ranjit More finds no urgency in this case and matter is posted for next hearing on date 28.11.2020. On the contrary in the case of Ratan Tata, in Criminal Writ Petition No.
1238 of 2019 the issue was only regarding order of Issue of Process and already the lower court proceeding was stayed by Justice Bhatkar vide order dated 18th March, 2019. There was no such immediate threat to life and liberty of Ratan Tata. But the same Bench headed by Judge Ranjit More vide order dated 18th April, 2019 placed the matter on „High on Board‟ and on date 11th June, 2019 heard the case and finally decided the case vide order dated 22nd July, 2019 for the so called urgency best known to the Justice Ranjit More. 
8. The second glaring example of discrimination of common, poor citizens and giving luxury, favour to rich people by Justice Ranjit More is the case of 300 employees who have put their sincere efforts and passed written examination, physical test and even medical test as required for recruitment in the „D‟ Group posts in Indian Railway. However, appointment of all these candidates is cancelled by the Railway and they have been deprived from the employment in the Indian Railway. They filed W. P. No. 7830 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court on 05.05.2017. In same matter the cases of other employees in other High Court and in Supreme Court were decided within 3 months and the said employees joined the job. There is a serious question of bread and butter of their family. But Justice Ranjit More since last many months had never kept the matter either on supplementary Board or High - On – Board. The preceipe for urgent circulation was rejected without any reason. To the contrary, the same Judge in a case of E - Cigarette W.P. No. 3690/2019 which was filed on 17th July, 2019 took the matter with urgency on 26th July, 2019 and then directed to place the matter „High on Board‟. Then vide order dated 30th July, 2019 directed to place the matter in supplementary board on 2nd August, 2019. On 2nd August, 2019 after Full Fledge argument the matter was finally allowed in favour of E-cigarette company. 9. Needless to mention here that the petitioner in E-cigarette‟s case and Ratan Tata‟s case were represented by Senior Advocate Amit Desai who was also banned by Bar members social activists in the case of Salman Khan for „out of turn‟ hearing of appeal against conviction. The glaring illegality is that Salman Khan was convicted on 6th May, 2015 Appeal heard and finally decided on 10th December, 2015 means within 7 months when salman Khan was on bail. There was no urgency to hear the appeal. To the contrary, Shri Gopal Shetye who was convicted on year 2010 was behind bars and not allowed to attend death rituals of his father and his appeal was heard by Bombay High Court on 10th June, 2015 i.e. after 5 years. The shocking part is that said Gopal Shetye who was in jail for 5 years was found to be innocent by the Bombay High Court observing that he was different person. This shows that how the fundamentals rights guaranteed under Article 14 of the Constitution of poor and common citizens are being violated by the High Court and the „Rich and Mighty‟ are enjoying the luxury of the Courts. Rightly said by the great jurist that „Law rules the poor And rich rules the Law‟. Hence the very foundation of our constitutional mandate is being abused and damaged by some elements like Justice Ranjit More. That, the inaction on the part of Chief Justice of Bombay High Court speaks a a lot. The act of commission, omission and insensitiveness and undue favour to Rich people and discrimination, unequal treatment to poor people, general advocates is lowering the majesty and dignity of Hon‟ble Bombay High Court which needs to be checked urgently and with stern hands........

It has been observed that advocates practising at High courts are elevated in same High Court as Judges. Due to this they cannot ignore their old friends and allow circulations ie urgent hearings of their matters. The Corporate or rich people appoint advocates as per the relationship with judge . They search that which advocate has good reputation towards which court. Using this goodwill the rich people appointing their counsel by paying premium to get early justice . This trick has 100% accuracy and they get speedy justice in courts bye passing poor litigants. If the newly appointed Judges are posted to non home location then such injustice can be stopped. Due to posting in home location supreme court rulings have no effect. Any how Justice Ranjit More is known for fast moving board in court hours. At High Court every judge have own parameters for circulation.





  2. A clean Judiciary is the foundation a strong Nation.

    It is very much necessary to eradicate such malpractices of functioning immediately to keep up the high standard of our Indian Judiciary.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FDA Maharashtra Directory Contact Moblie Number

Food and Drug Administration Directory  DOWNLOAD JUNE 2021 CONTACT LIST PLZ CLICK ADVERTISEMENT TO SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE FOR REVENUE FROM ADVERTISEMENT Field Office Circle Head (Assit Commissioner Address of Field Office Inspector AHMEDNAGAR A.T. RATHOD (7045757882) 19C, Siddhivinayak Colony,,Near Auxillium School, Savedi,,Ahmednagar - 414003 J.H.SHAIKH (9158424524) AKOLA H. Y. METKAR (9730155370) Civil Line, Akashwani Road, ,Akola ,AKOLA H. Y. METKAR (9730155370) AMARAVATI U.B.GHAROTE (9595829895) Office of the Joint Commissioner,Jawade Compound, Near Bus Stand,Amrawati-444 601 C. K. DANGE (9422844477) AURANGABAD S. S. KALE (9987236658) Office of the Joint Commissioner,,2nd floor, Nath Super Market, Aurangpura,Aurangabad R. M. BAJAJ (9422496941) AURANGABAD Zone 2

RTE & School Quota Of Kalyan Dombivli KDMC Region Thane

 Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Region School Quota and RTE 25% quota details received from RTI reply from KDMC Education department. Almost in all the schools free education seats for income below Rs1lac is vacant .The vacant seats are illegally filled by private school in open category by private schools by taking donations. KDMC education didnot taken any action. Total approved strength of class is 4 times of RTE quota. If RTE 25% quota is 25 then approved students limit is 100 students. Means 75 students from general and 25 from RTE 25% quota. In all the schools students are more than from approved strength and RTE 25% seats are vacant. It means RTE seats are filled by general students. As per RTE Act 2009 poor quota seats ie RTE25% cannot be filled by general quota in any condition and at any class. Helpline 9702859636  RTE Admission 

हिन्दू शब्द वेदों से लिया गया है ना की फ़ारसी से

  HINDU WORD ORIGIN PLZ CLICK ADVERTISEMENT TO SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE FOR REVENUE FROM ADVERTISEMENT हिन्दू शब्द सिंधु से बना है  औऱ यह फारसी शब्द है। परंतु ऐसा कुछ नहीं है! ये केवल झुठ फ़ैलाया जाता है।ये नितांत असत्य है  ........ "हिन्दू"* शब्द की खोज - *"हीनं दुष्यति इति हिन्दूः से हुई है।”* *अर्थात* जो अज्ञानता और हीनता का त्याग करे उसे हिन्दू कहते हैं। 'हिन्दू' शब्द, करोड़ों वर्ष प्राचीन, संस्कृत शब्द से है! यदि संस्कृत के इस शब्द का सन्धि विछेदन करें तो पायेंगे .... *हीन+दू* = हीन भावना + से दूर *अर्थात* जो हीन भावना या दुर्भावना से दूर रहे, मुक्त रहे, वो हिन्दू है ! हमें बार-बार, सदा झूठ ही बतलाया जाता है कि हिन्दू शब्द मुगलों ने हमें दिया, जो *"सिंधु" से "हिन्दू"* हुआ l *हिन्दू शब्द की वेद से ही उत्पत्ति है !* जानिए, कहाँ से आया हिन्दू शब्द, और कैसे हुई इसकी उत्पत्ति ? हमारे "वेदों" और "पुराणों" में *हिन्दू शब्द का उल्लेख* मिलता है। आज हम आपको बता रहे हैं कि हमें हिन्दू शब्द कहाँ से मिला है! "ऋग्वेद" के *"