ARE THEY OPERATING IN THE INTEREST OF POLITICAL FRIENDS/ EX CLIENTS?
TRIED TO BARGAINING IN COURT TO WITHDRAW ALL 25 PILs
|MEETING EDUCATION MINISTER VINOD TAWDE WITH GREETING|
4 July 2019 Mumbai: Bombay High Court Chief Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Nitin M Jamdar bench was hearing a petition of RTI activists Son for admission in vacant RTE 25 % quota . Chief justice asked petitioner/party in person that How Many PIL's You have Filed? Then Petitioner said approx 25 and in different subjected . Then CJ said that you are filing RTI and getting information after that you are filing PILs ,its all blackmailing. Later he said if you withdraw all PILs then only we will hear your writ petition for your son admission. When Petitioner said he can not withdraw PILs because it is for public cause then CJ dismissed his writ petition for filing PIL's at High Court. In Between Justice NM Jamdar was sharing comment with CJ.
As Per Justice Jamdar Profile from High Court Website
"Born in the family of lawyers, being fourth generation in the legal field. Graduated from University of Mumbai. Practiced in the Bombay High Court in almost all jurisdictions. Was also Standing Counsel for several public bodies. Represented Bombay High Court, Bar Council of India, Municipal Corporations, Zilla Parishads, Municipal Councils, Universities, Public trusts, Banks, Co-operative societies. Special Counsel for the Union of India.
Elevated as a Judge of the Bombay High court on 23 January 2012."
Being served for Municipal Corporations , banks.and other how a person can pass adverse order in PILs against their ex clients. Its conflict of interest to listen PILs against their client. Due to this reason the are hitting messengers as Blackmailer because their friends are in trouble due to irregularities.